DND statement is ‘ludicrous’ | Inquirer Opinion

DND statement is ‘ludicrous’

/ 05:14 AM January 20, 2018

The Inquirer reported that the Department of National Defense (DND) has cleared Special Assistant to the President Christopher “Bong” Go of intervening with the Philippine Navy’s P16-billion acquisition of two frigates (“DND clears top Duterte aide of meddling in warship deal,” Inquirer.net, 1/19/17). The statement of the DND is rather ludicrous. Why?

First, the statement said Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana erred in assuming that the controversial document favoring South Korea’s Hanwha Thales for the combat management system over Thales Nederlands Inc. came from Go. Yet it stated that the document was handed to Lorenzana in Malacañang. So from who else can it come from then?

“The secretary of national defense is confirming that no intervention or interference by Secretary Bong Go happened,” the statement said. “There was neither hint nor guidance from the Palace or from Secretary Bong Go to influence the implementation of the project.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Will the DND issue a statement confirming the intervention or meddling of the special assistant to the President? If they do, Lorenzana and others in the DND and Armed Forces of the Philippines will lose their jobs like what happened to Vice Adm. Ronald Mercado.

FEATURED STORIES

Lorenzana would not have sacked Mercado last December 2017 if there was no directive from the Commander in Chief himself.

RICK B. RAMOS, [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Christopher “Bong” Go, Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.