‘No moral justification to arm priests’ | Inquirer Opinion

‘No moral justification to arm priests’

/ 05:14 AM June 21, 2018

I’m an avid reader of the Inquirer. I find the news, “Bishops oppose arming priests”, (6/18/18), very interesting.

We can understand the argument of the bishops this way: Under moral law, self-defense in actual circumstances is justified when one is attacked by an unjust aggressor.

Arming priests, however, is understood as pre-emptive self-defense.

Article continues after this advertisement

Only personnel (e.g. military, police, etc.), who are duty-bound to maintain peace and order are entitled to pre-emptive self-defense.

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Pre-emptive self-defense is speculative (imagined) rather than the actual occurrence of unjust aggression.

Priesthood, by its very nature, is predisposed to peace, not violence.

Article continues after this advertisement

Therefore, there is no moral justification to arm priests.

FR. JAY-AR BABOR, MSC Missionaries of the Sacred Heart New Manila, Quezon City

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: arming priests, Inquirer letters, slain priest

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.