ECC still to rule if death was job-related | Inquirer Opinion

ECC still to rule if death was job-related

/ 12:19 AM August 18, 2011

This is in reference to the letter of Rosalinda L. Franco titled “SSS-Tarlac, head office runaround.” (Inquirer, 7/21/11) Franco, the surviving spouse of Felino P. Franco, said her claim for death benefits was “left unattended” by SSS-Tarlac for three years.

She said: “At first my claim was left unattended for three years. Now I am being given the runaround by SSS-Tarlac and the Medical Department at the SSS central office in Diliman, Quezon City.”

Franco’s husband, Felino, Lagoon and Pump Operator at the Central Azucarera de Tarlac, died of chronic renal failure caused by hypertension on Aug. 5, 2003. Franco filed for death benefits on Jan. 26, 2004, and SSS settled her claim in two days.

Article continues after this advertisement

After four years, on Oct. 24, 2008, Franco filed for death benefits under the Employees’ Compensation (EC) program. SSS-Tarlac declared Franco’s death was not job-related and denied her claim.

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

We wish to point out that Franco appealed her case directly to the Employees’ Compensation Commission (ECC). As a matter of procedure, the SSS Medical Operations Department (MOD) must review the appeal before it could be elevated to the ECC.

The ECC endorsed Franco’s appeal to MOD on March 24, 2011. After careful review, the MOD affirmed the findings of SSS Tarlac. The MOD forwarded the case to the ECC last July 20 and we await its final decision on the matter.

Article continues after this advertisement

—JOEL P. PALACIOS, assistant vice president, Media Affairs Department

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Employees Compensation Commission, Social Security System, SSS-Tarlac

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.