Repercussions of cybercrime law | Inquirer Opinion
Close  

Repercussions of cybercrime law

/ 12:51 AM March 09, 2014

We are featuring the views of lawyers Karen Jimeno and Ibarra Gutierrez III on the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, or Republic Act No. 10175.

Last week, we ran Harry Roque, Oscar Franklin Tan and Emerson S. Bañez’s take on the high court ruling that endorsed a provision seeking to penalize authors of libelous online content but not those receiving or reacting to it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court rejected a section of RA 10175 that would have allowed the Department of Justice to block access to online content.

The law, which some critics say would lead to “cyberauthoritarianism,” can now be implemented as a result of the high court’s ruling.

FEATURED STORIES

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Cybercrime law, Ibarra Gutierrez III, Karen Jimeno, Surpeme Court, Talk of the Town
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Fearless views on the news

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.