Palace misreads latest survey on Aquino satisfaction rating | Inquirer Opinion

Palace misreads latest survey on Aquino satisfaction rating

/ 09:21 PM October 20, 2013

Despite the clear drop in President Aquino’s satisfaction rating as reflected in Social Weather Stations’ September survey, presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte nonetheless thanked 68 percent of the respondents who, according to her, were “the great majority of our countrymen who have not been swayed by the enemies of reform.”

It won’t take an expert analyst to understand the underlying message in Valte’s statement. She was simply saying that those who are no longer satisfied with the Aquino administration have either been brainwashed or have become enemies of reform, while those who stay satisfied are the true advocates of reform.

This kind of thinking reflects a lot the mindset of the people in Malacañang. Instead of bringing the Filipinos together in the fight against corruption, this administration is trying to divide them into two opposite sides, with the dissenters being painted as

Article continues after this advertisement

enemies of reform.

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

What reform are they talking about anyway? Because as far as the people see, corruption has not been addressed by this administration after almost four long years of so-called reform. If there is anything that the SWS survey suggests, it is that the people are already seeing the truth that corruption still pervades under the Aquino administration.

—GUS LIM,

Article continues after this advertisement

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Abigail Valte, nation, news, SWS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.