CSC’s drive for transparency merits support | Inquirer Opinion

CSC’s drive for transparency merits support

/ 09:24 PM February 20, 2012

The House should study Republic Act 3019, which is about family expenses and taxes paid the previous year.

It must have been a Tolentino-Recto-Tañada-Marcos Senate that passed this anti-graft law in 1960. Will any court dare declare unconstitutional what the Civil Service Commission should have started enforcing decades ago?

Of course, stranger things are happening as the unelected Judiciary kick around the elected President and elected lawmakers.

Article continues after this advertisement

Unlike elected officials who have to submit to the electorate every three years, those on the bench have security of tenure, breeding insouciance, if not arrogance.

FEATURED STORIES

Imagine the few unelected issuing a ruling that the elected who are much, much more in numbers have gravely abused their discretion? This was never the intent of the framers of the Constitution—unless one looks at it in a martial law context.

—RENE SAGUISAG,

Article continues after this advertisement

ravslaw@gmail.com

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: civil service commission, Graft and Corruption, letters

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.