Corona impeachment case out of justices’ hands | Inquirer Opinion

Corona impeachment case out of justices’ hands

09:27 PM January 06, 2012

There will be no constitutional crisis nor any military takeover when the Supreme Court takes cognizance of the various petitions filed by some lawyers questioning the constitutionality of the impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Renato Corona. For sure, the Supreme Court will not stop the Senate from acting as an impeachment court to try and decide the Corona impeachment case.

As a matter of fact, the Supreme Court may eventually dismiss these petitions for lack of jurisdiction and/or lack of legal standing of these lawyers to file the cases.  The issues raised in the Supreme Court petitions, such as defective verification and lack of proper grounds to impeach, are the very same defenses raised by Corona in his answer where he asked the Senate “for the outright dismissal of the Impeachment Complaint or to enter a judgment of acquittal for all the Articles of Impeachment.”

The 2003 impeachment case against former Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr., where the Supreme Court took cognizance and granted the petitions of some lawyers assailing the constitutionality of the impeachment case, cannot be applied to Corona’s case. In the Davide case, the impeachment complaint had not yet been received by the Senate when the petitions were filed at the Supreme Court. In Corona’s case, the articles of impeachment had already been received by the Senate, and Corona had already filed his answer thereby submitting himself to or recognizing the jurisdiction of the impeachment court.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court may likewise dismiss the petitions for lack of legal standing or locus standi of the petitioners since they have not suffered any form of direct or personal injury as a result of the filing of the impeachment complaint against Corona. Furthermore, the grounds relied upon by the House of Representatives in impeaching Corona are political questions which the Supreme Court cannot review or overturn.

FEATURED STORIES

Finally, the Supreme Court does not usually touch on the issue of the constitutionality of an act of Congress if there are some other grounds upon which the Court may rest its judgment. As stated, the Senate has received the articles of impeachment against Corona; convened as an impeachment court; and Corona has already submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the Senate. These are enough grounds for the Supreme Court to avoid colliding with Congress on fundamental issues which can be resolved by the Senate as the sole constitutional body to try and decide impeachment cases.

It is very consoling that Corona immediately submitted to the jurisdiction of the impeachment court thereby avoiding any collision between the Senate and the Supreme Court.

—ROMULO B. MACALINTAL,

Philamlife Village,

Las Piñas City

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: corona impeachment, judiciary, letters, Military, Senate

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.