ICC probe: Too hot to handle | Inquirer Opinion

ICC probe: Too hot to handle

/ 04:35 AM August 02, 2022

Initially, it seemed that President Marcos Jr. took a proactive stance when he met with his key legal advisers last week to discuss the government’s position on the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) investigation of drug war killings under his predecessor, President Duterte.

Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra confirmed that the ICC investigation was the “only agenda” in the meeting also attended by Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla, Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Juan Ponce Enrile, Executive Secretary Victor Rodriguez, Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo, and former Duterte spokesperson Harry Roque.

But the officials did not disclose what decision was reached during the meeting.

Said Guevarra: “We have discussed with the President our legal options regarding the ICC case. We have all come to an agreement, but it may not be prudent to publicly disclose it at this time.” He added that they were leaving it to the President “to make any disclosure at this time.”


Yet, the signals were there.

Guevarra, as justice secretary of the Duterte administration, had been at the forefront of fending off the international tribunal’s investigation. In a speech in June 2020, he assured the United Nations Human Rights Council of the government’s commitment to addressing the drug killings in police operations.

Then, there’s Mr. Marcos’ legal counsel Enrile, also a Duterte supporter, and Roque, who had disparaged the ICC in defense of the former president, and is now Mr. Marcos’ “private counsel.” Both can hardly be expected to take a position inimical to the interest of their boss’ political ally.

But it is Remulla’s “opinion” that seemed to indicate where the Marcos Jr. administration is headed when it comes to this thorny issue. Said Remulla: “It’s my opinion that they have no jurisdiction over our country when it comes to these things that they want to investigate because we are not any more members of the ICC.”


Such position had earlier been clarified by the ICC, which said that while the Philippines on March 17, 2018, upon Duterte’s order, withdrew from the Rome Statute that created the court, the ICC “retains jurisdiction with respect to alleged crimes that occurred on the territory of the Philippines while it was a State Party, from 1 November 2011 up to and including 16 March 2019,” a period that covers the killings all the way back to Duterte’s term as Davao City mayor.

But, perhaps, the most telling was Mr. Marcos’ silence about adherence to human rights in his first State of the Nation Address, which left people guessing on how the new government would deal with the basic issue of rights and freedom.


The ICC seemed determined to pursue the process of investigating Duterte for “crimes against humanity.” After suspending its probe in November last year upon request of the Philippine government, ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan has asked the pre-trial chamber on June 24 to resume its probe, and gave the Philippine government up to Sept. 8 to comment on this resumption.

Back in November, Eduardo Malaya, Philippine ambassador to The Netherlands, formally asked for a halt to the investigation, saying the government had “undertaken, and continues to undertake, thorough investigations of all reported deaths during anti-narcotic operations in the country in accordance with the relevant procedures.”

But Khan described the justice department’s review of drug war killings involving the police as a mere “desk review” that does not merit a deferral of the process.

“I have concluded that the deferral request by the Philippines is not warranted, and that the investigation should resume as quickly as possible,” Khan said in a statement in June.

Cleaning up the Duterte administration’s bloody mess without getting tainted by it is the quandary that the Marcos Jr. administration finds itself in. Would it cooperate with the ICC and risk antagonizing the constituency of Vice President Sara Duterte and her father by calling attention to past human rights violations, or ignore the ICC altogether and reap global repercussions?

In the end, Mr. Marcos chose the latter. On Monday afternoon, the President announced that the Philippines “has no intention of rejoining” the ICC. Mr. Marcos echoed the position of his justice secretary that the ICC investigation is not necessary since the government is continuing with its own investigation of the drug war killings.

This is an unfortunate, if not unexpected, position, one that sends the wrong message to the international community so early into Mr. Marcos’ term when policy signals are keenly watched by investors and allies in the democratic sphere. Domestically, it will stoke seething sentiments about the curtailment of human rights, and the justice still denied victims of the brutal drug war.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

There is no doubt that being counted as part of the internationally recognized criminal justice court fighting global impunity is in the best interest of the country and its citizens, but this has proved too hot to handle for the new administration.

TAGS: Harry Roque, ICC drug war probe, marcos, Menardo Guevarra

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.