Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Radio on Inquirer.net

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Opinion/ Letters to the Editor Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Letters to the Editor

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  






imns



Decontrol shattered RP’s future


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 01:27:00 06/03/2009

Filed Under: Economy and Business and Finance, history

In his May 12 column, Juan L. Mercado said: ?The region?s (Asia?s) economic pacesetter in the 1960s, the Philippines trails badly today. In just 20 years, Malaysia and Thailand virtually scrubbed ?absolute penury.? China had a higher poverty incidence than the Philippines. Now Beijing?s poverty incidence is only half that of Manila.?

It was in the 1950s?definitely not in the 1960s?when the Philippines was rated by the World Bank as next only to Japan in Asia?s race for development. The industrial advances made by the Philippines in the 1950s, triggered by the import substitution strategy of development and under the protection of import and exchange controls, were in fact rolled back in the 1960s as a result of decontrol and devaluation prescribed by Washington through the World Bank-International Monetary Fund (WB-IMF).

This was what happened: In the 1950s, the Second Bell Mission to the Philippines recommended the adoption of import and exchange controls to curb the massive hemorrhage of US dollars from the Philippines. But Miguel Cuaderno and Horacio Lava of the Central Bank converted import and exchange controls into an import substitution strategy of development, under which more than 1,500 factories emerged. By 1958, President Carlos Garcia proclaimed a ?Filipino First Policy? and the country was poised to focus on heavy industries?apparently in the pursuit of Claro M. Recto?s call for ?nationalist industrialization??with the launching of the Iligan Integrated Steel Mills and FilOil.

But Diosdado Macapagal, with US support, became president in 1962 and, in exchange for US loans of almost $500 million, torpedoed import and exchange controls. In their place, he instituted decontrol and devaluation or, in short, free trade. Decontrol opened Philippine-made products to the competition of tax-exempt imported goods, while devaluation hiked the peso costs of imported machinery, spare parts and raw materials. Only a few of the import substitution factories survived the massacre; even the survivors were marginalized.

Thus began the WB-IMF control over the commanding heights of the Philippine economy, under which all Philippine presidents (without exception from Macapagal to his daughter, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo) have been mere overseers (katiwala) of the WB-IMF. Their prime duty has been and still is to enforce WB-IMF debt conditions, not the Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.

No question about it, during the 1950s the Philippines was ahead of Malaysia and Thailand in Asia?s development race. But today Malaysia and Thailand are newly industrializing economies, while the Philippines is a failed economy, dependent upon foreign countries for the employment of its citizens. China and the Philippines are simply not in the same league. The Philippines is a Third World country; China not only belongs to the First World but it is now the third largest economy in the world, pushing Germany?the largest economy in Europe?to fourth place.

?AMADO GAT INCIONG,
Cubao, Quezon City



Copyright 2011 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2011 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
BizLinq