SCTex shows us how infra should be built | Inquirer Opinion

SCTex shows us how infra should be built

/ 05:05 AM July 19, 2011

What is significant about the Subic-Clark-Tarlac expressway development is not so much that the government has been relieved of the debt burden of the SCTex, because it had transferred the debt servicing obligations entirely to the private sector through revenue-sharing and advances during shortfalls.

When we consider that, traditionally, it is government’s responsibility to spend for infrastructure needed by the public, the agreement we concluded with the Manila North Tollways Corp. (MNTC) created a model for building infrastructure like SCTex at no cost to government. Not only will the Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) not spend for the expressway, it will still earn from the project since the total revenue share of

BCDA (P64 billion) during the operating period will roughly be double that of the debt service (P34 billion). Plus it will get back the expressway, with its potential for another round of revenues.

Article continues after this advertisement

MNTC, on the other hand, will only have to contend with commercial risks associated with unmet traffic volume projections. There are no longer any construction risks as the project has been completed. It is a win-win situation.

FEATURED STORIES

The BCDA-MNTC model also shows the way for constructing what initially are non-viable projects but with high economic benefits. The SCTex project would not have been financially viable because it was an east-west missionary road, and private sector proponents could only get at most a seven- to 15-year loan. What made it viable was the 40-year ODA (Official Development Assistance) loan which has a 10-year grace period at concessionary interest. MNTC, a private company, in effect was able to avail itself of a long-term loan at concessionary terms, for the public good.

This is the reverse of a number of BOT (build-operate-transfer, now called public-private partnership or PPP) projects that started out as private sector undertakings but with government guaranteeing against commercial risks (e.g., take or pay provisions) or guaranteeing a minimum return on investments (e.g., MRT).

Article continues after this advertisement

—FELICITO C. PAYUMO, chairman, Bases Conversion Development Authority

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: SCTEX

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.