SET’s final decision | Inquirer Opinion

SET’s final decision

/ 09:39 PM June 29, 2012

May we clarify the editorial titled “Infection in the poll system” (Inquirer, 6/16/12) which said: “Zubiri can insist on a veneer of innocence only because the Senate Electoral Tribunal has not ruled with finality on who actually won between him and Pimentel.”

In fact, the SET ruled with finality in its decision that was “immediately executory,” in Case No. 001-07 dated Aug. 11, 2011, that Aquilino Martin L. Pimentel III garnered 10,898,786 votes while Juan Miguel Zubiri garnered 10,640,620.

To highlight the significant portion of the decision, the SET ruled:

Article continues after this advertisement

“It being clear from the above figures that Pimentel indeed obtained 258,166 more votes than Zubiri in the senatorial race in the 14 May 2007 National and Local Elections, the proclamation of Zubiri as the 12th winning senatorial candidate by the Comelec-NBC should be, as it is hereby annulled and set aside, and a new one entered, declaring Pimentel as the duly elected senator of the Philippines.”

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

—ELMAR JAY MARTIN I. DEJARESCO,

Office of Sen. Koko Pimentel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III, Letters to the Editor, Miguel zubiri, opinion, politics, Senate Electoral Tribunal, SET

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.