The need to implement a public vetting system for candidates

The democratic process is a fundamental aspect of modern governance, enabling citizens to select their leaders and representatives. However, the efficacy of this process can be compromised when candidates lack the necessary qualifications or competencies to govern effectively.

In light of this, implementing a method similar to marriage banns, a well-established practice in certain religious traditions that publicly announces an upcoming marriage, could prove to be a valuable tool for screening national and local candidates in elections. This approach would not only ensure that only qualified individuals run for office but also conserve governmental resources that could otherwise be wasted on campaigns for less competent candidates.

A system of public vetting for candidates could entail a period during which their qualifications, backgrounds, and potential conflicts of interest are thoroughly examined by the community. This could be in the form of public forums, where candidates present their credentials and interact with constituents, or a formal review process carried out by an impartial body.

Implementing a system of candidate vetting similar to marriage banns would require careful consideration and legislative action. The initial step in this process would involve conducting a thorough study to evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of such a system. This study should engage stakeholders from various sectors, including political scientists, legal experts, community leaders, and citizens.

After completing the study, a legislative proposal, either a Senate or House bill outlining the specifics of the candidate vetting process can be filed. This proposal should outline the criteria for candidate qualifications, the methods for public involvement, and the timeline for the vetting process. It is imperative that the proposal includes measures to ensure fairness and prevent discrimination, thereby protecting the rights of all potential candidates.

It is crucial to engage with lawmakers and advocacy groups during this phase to build support and address any concerns that may arise. Public hearings will allow citizens to express their views and contribute to the legislative process, ensuring that the final law truly represents the people’s wishes.

The implementation of a candidate vetting system is seen to combat the challenges presented by unqualified candidates. Guaranteeing that only individuals with the necessary skills and integrity are permitted to run for office does not only elevate the standard of governance but also reinstates public confidence in the electoral process.

When citizens have faith that their leaders are competent and capable of addressing their community’s most pressing concerns, they are more inclined to participate in the democratic process.

REGINALD B. TAMAYO,

Marikina City