Face mask rule is anti-poor | Inquirer Opinion

Face mask rule is anti-poor

04:02 AM August 10, 2020

The Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases is considering requiring individuals to wear face shields — another expense for us — in public places. It was also reported that the President was not joking when he said we should use gasoline as disinfectant. How can we be so petty? Can this government, please, do better inspiring us with bigger things like new strategies, a comprehensive approach to beat the COVID-19 threat, and the promised roadmap to recovery?

On the mandatory wearing of face masks: I agree that wearing face masks is absolutely necessary to prevent transmission of the virus. It should be enforced without exception. But I must say that the rule is anti-poor, not unlike the anti-poor ECQ stay-home rule that pushed tricycle, jeepney, truck, and bus drivers and riders and other ordinary workers out of job, and kept the poor, the sidewalk vendors, and the jobless from moving around to find work and food to put on their table.

Why do I say the rule on wearing masks is anti-poor?

ADVERTISEMENT

The cheapest face mask costs P25 apiece, retail. Buying one mask each day to have one person in a household in vulnerable communities go out for necessities amounts to P750 a month—money the breadwinner has to take from the already meager earnings he makes, if he makes any. Saving P750 for food and other necessities, instead of spending it on face masks, could force a household to send somebody out for necessities without a mask on, risking arrest. Now, this government just might require face shields, which cost P150 each!

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Last July 21, I wrote Parañaque City Mayor Edwin L. Olivarez, to propose that the city government supply needy families in our community with masks before it orders the jailing of anybody not wearing masks in the streets. No reply. I now urge the national government to supply households in vulnerable communities all over the country with face masks—or face shields, should the IATF proceed with the plan.

Col. Leonardo O. Odoño (Ret.)
PMA ‘64, [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: coronavirus pandemic, coronavirus philippines, COVID-19, Leonardo O. Odono, Letters to the Editor

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.