Is this really love? | Inquirer Opinion
At Large

Is this really love?

The “creative presentation” by the Anak Teatro ng Culiat, a children’s theater group, was foreseen to be traumatic for some members of the audience that organizers prepared debriefing services at the venue.

The occasion was the official launch of the Official Plan of Action to End Violence against Children, a document prepared through a number of consultations with government bodies, led by the Council for the Welfare of Children (CWC), and by Unicef, NGOs working with children, health caregivers, educators, and most important of all—children themselves.

And true enough, the stage presentation was so realistic, so resonant with reality and memory, that some in the audience were moved to tears. A line that touched me particularly was uttered by a character who was being continually abused—physically and emotionally — by his father. The father justified the abuse as being done out of love, “so that you would remember and not repeat your mistakes.” This led the boy to wonder: “Is this really what love is all about? If he really loves me, why does he hurt me all the time?”

Article continues after this advertisement

Another highlight of the staging: To illustrate the use of corporal punishment, characters wielded outsized instruments used to inflict pain on children: a slipper, a belt, a wire hanger. Common household items, but perhaps in the eyes of children at the receiving end of the punishment, truly gigantic and menacing.

FEATURED STORIES

Seven “key result areas” have been highlighted in the Plan of Action: the practice of “evidence-based” parenting and positive discipline; children and adolescents demonstrate personal skills in protecting themselves from violence; all children have access to appropriate and quality protection services; the child protection framework is effectively in place; all laws related to violence against children are in place; and child protection systems at all levels are effectively functioning.

Government was sufficiently represented at the launch, led by Department of Social Welfare and Development officer in charge Emmanuel Leyco and Rep. Karlo Nograles, who chairs the House appropriations committee. Other government departments were present as well, along with NGOs and sectoral groups, including parents with a pair of mothers who head their community organizations of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) beneficiaries, and the children themselves, a pair of 15-year-olds.

Article continues after this advertisement

Nograles, in his capacity as the “shepherd” of the national budget through the House, promised to give priority to “projects for the welfare of children,” including programs addressing childhood malnutrition. Later, at the press conference following the launch, in response to a question about the clash between parental rights and children’s rights, Nograles stressed that the most important criterion in making judgment is “the best interests of the child.”

Article continues after this advertisement

For her part, Mitch Cajayon-Uy, CWC executive director, said they are committed to monitoring the implementation of the Plan of Action from the national to the barangay level, and promised to work for the passage of bigger appropriations for child protection.

Article continues after this advertisement

Men in power, it seems to me, have an inflated sense of their charisma.

This is borne out by our very own President, who declared in a public gathering of bankers and financiers that in light of the International Monetary Fund’s pessimistic outlook on the Philippine economy, all that needs to be done is to “pull into a corner” IMF chief Christine Lagarde and “kiss her, and son of a b—h, she would change her mind.”

Article continues after this advertisement

It wasn’t reported whether his audience responded with laughter or were stunned into stupefaction, but I gravely doubt if the rest of the world, especially the IMF, found our great leader’s misogynist words all that amusing.

“At least we can’t accuse him of ageism,” a social media critic noted, with tongue firmly in cheek. But really, our President’s crass words have truly become an inexcusable embarrassment.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

This, too, is violence against children and women—the demeaning of women’s agency and honor, and the miseducation of the youth on respect for individuals, especially for women who hold grave responsibilities in the world.

TAGS: children, theater, violence against children

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.