Hard-hitting Tulfo naive at times? | Inquirer Opinion
Letters to the Editor

Hard-hitting Tulfo naive at times?

/ 12:55 AM March 04, 2017

Allow me to react to Ramon Tulfo’s Feb. 21 column, “De Lima’s karma” (Metro, 2/21/17). He said that while there was no direct evidence linking former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) scam, “De Lima probably knew that if ever, it was GMA’s husband, Mike, who may have been the recipient of the booty.”

What Tulfo was saying in effect was, GMA was innocent; and if at all, the party guilty of having benefited from the scam was her husband. Can Tulfo, the hard-hitting opinion-maker, be that naive sometimes? Can he really say with absolute confidence that GMA was not aware of what her husband was doing during her reign?

Only recall that GMA was all over China with her husband at the time the NBN-ZTE deal was being “negotiated.”  No less than the Senate investigated the “bukol” that whistle-blower Jun Lozada testified on. It later recommended the prosecution of GMA for corruption.

Article continues after this advertisement

Did it really look to Tulfo that GMA had nothing to do with that “bukol” in the NBN-ZTE project?  Did it really seem to him that GMA had left P365 million in PCSO’s intelligence funds entirely in the hands of its general manager, Rosario Uriarte—and did not know the latter was her husband’s stooge and gofer?

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Come on, Mr. Tulfo, man up, man.

GRACE PO-QUICHO, [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Grace Po-Quicho, Inquirer letters, Leila de Lima, On Target, Ramon Tulfo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.