Zubiri’s delicadeza unlike Defensor’s | Inquirer Opinion

Zubiri’s delicadeza unlike Defensor’s

/ 02:37 AM August 11, 2011

Much is being made in television media about Miguel Zubiri’s “high sense of delicadeza” in resigning his Senate seat. Is Zubiri’s resignation four years too late? Have people forgotten that as early as 2007, unlike Zubiri, Mike Defensor immediately refused to “win” on the then partially counted Maguindanao votes, stating “he did so to stop their Team Unity from committing acts inimical to the essence of democracy and fair play in an electoral battle”?

And is Zubiri’s resignation again at least three years too late? Three years ago Koko Pimentel reportedly proved beyond reasonable doubt that Zubiri had lost the election by more than 200,000 votes.

But already, two-thirds of Pimentel’s rightful senatorial term have been lost due to the delays. Do the delays, all too typical in electoral protests that are uselessly won virtually at the end of the winner’s term, indicate that something is grievously wrong with the system that urgently needs correction?

—BENJAMIN B. AGUNOD,
[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: 2007 senatorial elections, delicadeza, Koko Pimentel, Migz Zubiri, Mike Defensor

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.