Inappropriate charges vs Napeñas, Purisima | Inquirer Opinion
Close  

Inappropriate charges vs Napeñas, Purisima

12:04 AM April 20, 2016

In my opinion the charges made by the Ombudsman against former director general Alan Purisima and former Special Action Force (SAF) chief Getulio Napeñas are inappropriate. In his testimony during the Senate hearing, Napeñas said there had been an outstanding warrant of arrest for Marwan since 2009. Meaning, the SAF could have served the arrest warrant before or after 2010.

The only difference was the tip received by Purisima from US intelligence on the whereabout of Marwan, which he shared with Napeñas. If the sharing of a vital information by a suspended officer with a SAF commander is illegal, it is for the prosecutors to prove.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reason for the many casualties on the side of the SAF commandos during the Mamasapano encounter was due to poor planning and implementation, not the illegality of actions attributed to the sharing of information between Purisima and Napeñas.

—I.C. MANALILI, Calamba City

FEATURED STORIES

Subscribe to our opinion newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Alan Purisima, Getulio Napeñas, Mamasapano
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our opinion columns

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.