Right of reply undermines press freedom | Inquirer Opinion

Right of reply undermines press freedom

01:24 AM March 29, 2016

INQUIRER COLUMNIST Oscar Franklin Tan nailed it in “VP has no right to demand right to reply” (Front Page, 3/21/16). A legal principle that safeguards freedom of speech and expression is the principle of no prior restraint—that is, no person may be restrained from speaking, or writing. There is another principle of equal weight: no person may be compelled to speak, or, to write.

With reference to the press, specifically print media, the principle is also known as editorial judgment, with good reason. Because of this, to demand publication of a reply would amount to compelled speech.

ADVERTISEMENT

—JO IMBONG, [email protected]

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Journalism, letter, Media, opinion, Right to Reply
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our opinion columns

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2023 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.