Right of reply undermines press freedom | Inquirer Opinion

Right of reply undermines press freedom

01:24 AM March 29, 2016

INQUIRER COLUMNIST Oscar Franklin Tan nailed it in “VP has no right to demand right to reply” (Front Page, 3/21/16). A legal principle that safeguards freedom of speech and expression is the principle of no prior restraint—that is, no person may be restrained from speaking, or writing. There is another principle of equal weight: no person may be compelled to speak, or, to write.

With reference to the press, specifically print media, the principle is also known as editorial judgment, with good reason. Because of this, to demand publication of a reply would amount to compelled speech.

—JO IMBONG, bcomsavvy@gmail.com

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Journalism, letter, Media, opinion, Right to Reply

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.