It’s not ‘Bongbong,’ it should be ‘Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’ | Inquirer Opinion

It’s not ‘Bongbong,’ it should be ‘Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’

12:00 AM March 01, 2016

THE INQUIRER ran an excellent series of articles on the 30th anniversary of the Edsa Revolution with a continuing theme: the need to preserve the hard-won gains of People Power.

President Aquino took to the stage to warn Filipinos of the danger of a return to the dictatorship.

In this regard, the Inquirer should lead the Philippine press to stress the President’s warning, not with bias or partiality, but simply by clearly and accurately reporting the full name of the dictator’s son: Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

He claims to be proud of his father’s legacy and, therefore, he should always be referred to as Ferdinand Marcos Jr. He should not be called Bongbong Marcos. He is Ferdinand Marcos Jr. His campaign coverage should state that Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is running for the vice presidency, a heartbeat away from the position his father held by force for decades.

FEATURED STORIES

Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is the legitimate son of Ferdinand Marcos and Imelda Romualdez Marcos. His DNA is biologically linked to many of the martial law administrators—from Fabian Ver to Kokoy Romualdez.

Let us be clear: Every voter should know what may be forgotten by media: A vote for Bongbong is a vote for Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

—MARTIN D. BAUTISTA, [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bongbong Marcos, feedback, Ferdinand Marcos, letter, marcos, martial law, opinion

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.