Mere possession of bullet is already a crime | Inquirer Opinion

Mere possession of bullet is already a crime

12:33 AM November 07, 2015

While I agree with some of the views Ramon Tulfo expressed in his column “‘Special’ prosecutors” (Metro, 11/3/15), I wish to take exception particularly to his statement that “[i]t doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that a bullet without a gun is useless.”

Conversely, is he saying that a gun without a bullet is also useless?


A bullet (or bullets) is ammunition of which the mere possession without proper authority is a violation of the law. The law does not require that in order to be criminally liable, the person caught in unauthorized possession of ammunition or bullets must also be in possession of a gun.

Stretching that line of reasoning, are we to let go of a person found transporting several boxes of bullets simply because there are no guns found in his possession? It does not take a rocket scientist either to know the answer.


—GEORGE C. DEE, [email protected]

Subscribe to our opinion newsletter

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: bullet planting, laglag bala, tanim bala
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.