After the ‘Enrile Decision,’ what’s next for SC?

THE BROUHAHA over the Supreme Court decision granting bail to Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile in a plunder case provided the legal community some “exotic” food for thought. Many say it is a political accommodation; others opine it was rendered without basis in law.

And now the ponente has to formally complain to Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno about a dissenting colleague “for gross distortions and putting him in bad light.” This spectacle of the ponente taking to task a colleague for the way the latter dissented from the majority decision is as rare as removing a chief justice from office.

While we discern robustness in the Supreme Court from this latest incident, we also delight in seeing a judicial divide percolating in the highest tribunal.

The country needs such display of erudite discussion of important issues affecting our lives. An honest-to-goodness investigation and the eventual resolution of the matter will surely enrich students of law and the bar as well.

—BENJIE GUERRERO, Business Center, Sulo Riviera, Diliman, Quezon City

Read more...