Combining ‘widow’ and ‘late’ redundant | Inquirer Opinion

Combining ‘widow’ and ‘late’ redundant

/ 12:02 AM August 13, 2015

I always read the Inquirer and I often see the mistake of your reporters in using the words “widow” and “late.”

Look at the report titled “Mom knows best, declares Mar running in Palace race” (Front Page, 5/31/15): “The widow of the late Sen. Gerardo Roxas (underscoring supplied) is known to be a pivotal player in all of her son’s previous political campaigns but she stays behind the scene.”

“Widow” is a woman whose husband has died while “late” means dead. To use both in the context shown above is redundant. It should have been: “The widow of Sen. Gerardo Roxas” or “the wife of the late Sen. Gerardo Roxas.” My professor in journalism before taught our class about it.

ADVERTISEMENT

More power to you and your newspaper and may the good Lord bless and keep you.

FEATURED STORIES

—CONRADO C. FERNANDEZ, Bagumbong, Caloocan City

Mr. Fernandez, thank you for pointing out to us our mistake. We learned by our mistakes. Keep spotting them for us, please.—Ed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: grammar, INQUIRER, Mar Roxas

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.