Philconsa’s anti-BBL petition ‘obstructive’ | Inquirer Opinion

Philconsa’s anti-BBL petition ‘obstructive’

/ 12:02 AM June 27, 2015

Philconsa and its copetitioners are plainly obstructive in asking the Supreme Court to declare repugnant and unconstitutional the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (which was signed in Malacañang in March 2014) and the Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro, even as Congress is deliberating on the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) to ensure its constitutional validity and full effectiveness.

Many more know and believe in the valid and timely role of the proposed BBL in achieving genuine regional autonomy and lasting peace with justice for our Moro brothers and sisters and indigenous peoples in the Bangsamoro; and lasting peace and continuing development in all of Mindanao.

It has taken over 17 years of conflict and peace and regional autonomy talks to reach the present level of progress. Congress is doing its utmost to get the proposed BBL enacted. The BBL will establish an autonomous Bangsamoro region to replace the failed Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.

Article continues after this advertisement

What has the Philconsa done lately to help build a functional democracy and promote good governance under our 1987 Constitution?

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

—DR. JOSE V. ABUEVA,

University of the Philippines professor emeritus of political science and public administration, advocate of Bangsamoro and Federal-Parliamentary Democracy, a co-organizer of the Centrist Democratic Party-Partido ng Tunay na Demokrasya

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: BBL, letters

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.