The Inquirer editorialized on the case of Lenny Villa (“The silence that kills,” Opinion, 7/11/14).
Villa was killed on Feb. 11, 1991, in an Ateneo Law hazing tragedy. Twenty-six were accused, including Zosimo Mendoza. He retained our firm for himself after all 26 accused were swiftly convicted by the Caloocan Regional Trial Court in 1993, which year of conviction the editorial inaccurately said was the year of arraignment. The editorial erred when it stated that “the first trial date was in 2005.”
In fact, by then the case was in the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeals, where we started representing Mendoza, had acquitted them twice, in the judgment proper and in a motion for reconsideration, earlier, in 2002. Only six were convicted.
On Feb. 1, 2012, the Supreme Court acquitted again the 20 who had earlier been acquitted, for the third time. But, it entertained another motion to reconsider in a mind-blowing case of multiple jeopardy. The motion is pending, after two and a half years; Mendoza and others continue to twist in the wind, 24 years after the 1991 tragedy.
Severity of punishment does not deter. Certainty and swiftness of punishment do.
Predictability and consistency are also to be desired. We try to teach, in vain, that
acquittals are immediately final, unappealable and executory.
We share the pain of the Villas, but when the immature system itself is the victim of hazing, the wound is deeper.
—R.A.V. SAGUISAG,
ravslaw@gmail.com