Best to de-link ‘security’ ties with Japan from old issues
Inquirer’s June 27 editorial titled “Japan on our mind” well expresses the attitude of the nation regarding its new relationship with Japan and our request for her assistance amid our growing dispute with China. It would be altogether a commendable article which, however, disappoints with its very last paragraph. Let us be clear: The grievance case of our Filipino “comfort women” against the government of Japan is a legitimate one and one that should be pursued and, as we understand it, is, in fact, currently still the subject of negotiations. But its mention in the article is misplaced.
In making his case for Japan to be able “to address its international obligations” and thus make possible Japanese assistance to the Philippines in security matters, President Aquino made it clear that the Philippines has entered into a new era of relationship with Japan. He is quoted thus: “Very few would question the devastation that my country suffered through World War II. However, since the middle of the 20th century…. (the Philippines’) relationship with Japan has been characterized by trust and unfailing support.” Indeed, shortly after the end of the war, the Philippines was the beneficiary of generous reparations, financial and material, from Japan. It continues to be the recipient of assistance from Japan, coursed through the Japan International Cooperation Agency and other Japanese governmental and private institutions.
Our security issue—the matter of sovereignty over our maritime shoals, islets and reefs being slowly eroded and taken over by the Chinese—is of paramount concern. As we seek the assistance of our allies, in particular Japan, we should de-link issues and concerns, especially of the past, which may project the Philippines in a bad light. If we do not do so, we may ultimately be viewed as insincere, opaque and, yes, mercenary.
Article continues after this advertisement—MARIANO S. JAVIER,
