SSS benefit petition resolved with finality by Supreme Court | Inquirer Opinion

SSS benefit petition resolved with finality by Supreme Court

02:05 AM March 26, 2014

This is in reply to the complaint of Priscilla Mañalac, the surviving spouse of Social Security System (SSS) member Carlos Mañalac. According to her, she has a pending claim with the SSS Medical Operations Department regarding the partial disability benefits received by her late husband (“Paging SSS medical dep’t,” Opinion, 3/1/14).

We checked our records and there is no such claim.

Based on records, Mr. Mañalac was granted partial permanent disability benefits under the Social Security law (Republic Act No. 8282) in 1979, 1994, 1996 and 2002. Also in 2002, he received a partial permanent disability benefit under Presidential Decree No. 626 (the Employees Compensation [EC] Law), as amended. No petition has since been filed before the SSS or Employees Compensation Commission with regard to these particular benefits.

Article continues after this advertisement

Ms Mañalac, however, had a previous appeal against a benefit decision denying her claim for death benefits under the EC law. But her case has long been resolved by the Supreme Court in a resolution dated Nov. 17, 2010, wherein the Court denied her petition with finality (SC GR No. 189225, Priscilla Mañalac v SSS).

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

—MARISSU G. BUGANTE,

Vice-President, SSS Public Affairs

Article continues after this advertisement

and Special Events Division

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Employees Compensation Commission, Social Security System, SSS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.