Claim that truck ban cost BoC millions baseless | Inquirer Opinion

Claim that truck ban cost BoC millions baseless

/ 12:02 AM March 24, 2014

The Inquirer’s March 18 editorial noted that because of the truck ban imposed by the city government of Manila, the Bureau of Customs lost, between Feb. 24 and 26, 2014, P489 million in revenue collections—specifically, P272.59 million at the Port of Manila and P217.39  million at the Manila International Container Port.

Customs duties are paid when the shipments reach the Customs collection districts, not when they leave the gates of the districts. The claim by the bureau has, therefore, no basis.

Secondly, cargo ships did not bypass the ports in Manila because of the truck ban. This means that Customs collection should be unaffected by the truck ban. It only means that more containers were temporarily stored in the container port—emphasis on the “temporarily.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Third, in the best-(or worst-?)case scenario, a ship moves to Batangas or other Philippine ports for cargo delivery. This means the bureau should still be able to collect the same amount on the diverted shipments, albeit the collection districts in Manila will have lower collections.

FEATURED STORIES

The manufacturing companies in Calabarzon will continue to produce regardless of what the mayor of Manila does; but when company employees stop working due to lack of raw materials, that is the time it can be said that the truck ban has adversely affected their operations. But it also means failure of management.

—Rodolfo D. Paiso,

Article continues after this advertisement

rdpowermarine@yahoo.com

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: economy, nation, news, Truck ban

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.