‘Typhoon-free’ Mindanao? | Inquirer Opinion
Kris-Crossing Mindanao

‘Typhoon-free’ Mindanao?

By now it has become a comical refrain. But we can only understand how history, a discipline that entails hours of documentary research, eludes many of our government functionaries and even opinion writers. The perils come when government itself mouths incorrect facts and forces them as the truth on a public gullible enough to blame almost every devastating weather disturbance on the 21st-century sensation that is climate change or global warming.

Consider what a “senior weather specialist” said: “Compared to the years prior to (Tropical Storm) ‘Sendong’ and (Typhoon) ‘Pablo’ in Mindanao, Pagasa’s tropical cyclone climatological tracks show that the direction of typhoons comes from its starting point usually in the Pacific Ocean to upward in Luzon, Visayas and just some parts in Mindanao, specifically in Surigao. Now, Cagayan de Oro, Misamis Oriental and its neighboring towns have become a new path.” Notice how it even misses out the real existence of the “amihan” and the “habagat.”

Or this from Secretary Luwalhati Antonino, who heads the Mindanao Development Authority: “Typhoons are the new normal in Mindanao. This is a reality that we are facing now. We can no longer say that Mindanao is free from typhoons as we used to say before.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Before, (storms) almost never reached Cebu, and definitely not Davao. Now, they do,” said Jose Maria Lorenzo Tan, president of World Wildlife Fund Philippines.

FEATURED STORIES

But a closer look into history tells otherwise.

How could we have missed this? Could it be because weather tracking is a relatively new government function in the Philippines? In the Hispanic era, there was no government unit to track weather conditions, but there was the Observatorio de Manila that the Spanish Jesuit Federico Faura founded. The Spanish colonial government enlisted the observatory as its official weather station. That arrangement persisted well into the 20th century, just before the present Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration, or Pagasa, came into being.

Article continues after this advertisement

When Pablo hit Cateel and Baganga in Davao Oriental, the common refrain was, these towns were never hit by typhoons before. But the Jesuit Miguel Selga, who succeeded Faura, has a different account. He wrote about a typhoon that hit parts of the Philippines on Aug. 10-30, 1892: “Coming from south of the Palaos (Palau), this typhoon crossed Mindanao from Baganga to Dapitan (in the Zamboanga peninsula), proceeded to northern Palawan and, inclining in the China Sea more to the northwest, reached the (Asian) continent north of Hainan.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Davao and southern Mindanao typhoon-free? Not according to Selga: “October 8-11, 1904, a depression formed far to the southeast of the Visayas, and moved west, passing south of Mindanao.” Then this, “October 29-31, 1904, a depression entered the archipelago south of Cape San Agustin (part of today’s Davao Oriental), passed close to Sarangani Island, crossed the Jolo group and entered the China Sea.” Or this: “October 26-November 1, 1909, a typhoon formed south southwest of Palau, moved west northwest, entered Mindanao by the south of Caraga, passed north of Davao, crossed the province of Cotabato (yes, Cotabato), went out to the Sulu Sea by the south of Dapitan, traversed the southern part of Paragua (Palawan) and entered the continent between Bangoi and Ninhhoa. Manay, Santa Cruz and Mati (currently Davao Oriental towns except Santa Cruz which is now a Davao del Sur municipality) suffered heavily.

Article continues after this advertisement

Other points of Mindanao were equally ravaged. “October 1870, a strong hurricane was felt in the province of Misamis (note that until 1930, there was only one Misamis province). Many houses and rice fields were destroyed. The river overflowed its banks and many herds of carabaos and cattle were drowned and numerous houses were washed away. A banca was wrecked, and its cargo of 400 cavans of rice was totally lost.”

More: “October 23-24, 1898, starting from east southeast of Palau, a depression reached Mindanao, crossed Davao, Cotabato and the Zamboanga peninsula and continued to the China Sea across southern Palawan.” I have come across ethnographic books that describe southern Palawan as also typhoon-free.

Article continues after this advertisement

This one should surprise residents of Cateel and Baganga: “November 24-December 2, 1912, a typhoon formed east southeast of Guam, moved rapidly on a west course to Mindanao, entering between Cateel and Baganga.” Or this: “November 28-December 6, 1910, a typhoon formed over the southern part of the western Carolines, moved west close to the south of Palau, passed very near Davao and Mati, then to the north of Cotabato in a northwest direction.” Then this: On Dec. 15-21, 1909: “a typhoon recurved east of Visayas; a secondary center entered Mindanao, passed over Butuan, crossed Bohol and Cebu and filled up over Negros. Strong winds and heavy rains were experienced at Baganga, Butuan, Garcia Hernandez, Duero and Cebu.”

Selga’s “Charts of Remarkable Typhoons in the Philippines” lists more typhoons than this column space can accommodate. Clearly, the onus now is to disabuse ourselves of the erroneous belief of a “typhoon-free Mindanao,” a belief that can be more destructive than a real strong typhoon, if allowed to persist.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: climate change, Global Warming, Mindanao, news, regions, Typhoon

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.