Santiago clarifies stance on PDAF realignment | Inquirer Opinion

Santiago clarifies stance on PDAF realignment

/ 09:36 PM January 10, 2014

This is to clarify some details in the news item titled “9 senators realign P1.8-billion pork” by TJ Burgonio and Gil Cabacungan (Front Page, 1/9/14).

The news article failed to mention that, in keeping with the recent Supreme Court decision on the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago submitted her proposed budget amendment to the Senate committee on finance, transferring all the appropriations culled from the PDAF and then distributed by the House of Representatives to other agencies, such as the Department of Public Works and Highways, Department of Health, Department of Social Welfare and Development, Department of Interior and Local Government, Technical Education and Skills Development Authority, and Commission on Higher Education, to the Calamity and Contingent Funds.

ADVERTISEMENT

She also proposed that under the Calamity Fund, another special provision should be included, setting aside P10 billion for the relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction of the provinces, cities and municipalities affected by the Bohol-Cebu earthquake and Supertyphoon “Yolanda.”

With regard to her own PDAF, she categorically said in one of her letters to Sen. Francis Escudero, chair of the Senate committee on finance, that she is against the PDAF in “any manner, shape, form, or under any name.”

FEATURED STORIES

—TOM TOLIBAS,

public affairs and media relations officer,

Office of Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Gil Cabacungan, Letters to the Editor, Miriam Defensor Santiago, opinion, PDAF, PDAF realignment, TJ Burgonio
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.