In defense of Jeane | Inquirer Opinion
Young Blood

In defense of Jeane

/ 11:00 PM September 14, 2013

If you’ve got it, flaunt it.

I start with a question: Why can’t Jeane Napoles take pictures of the stuff she owns? Just because some people are offended that they can’t afford it? It’s not her fault that poor people are poor. It may have been done in bad taste, but it’s not a crime to be proud of what you have.

Social media networks are specifically designed for people to connect, and, yes, “sell” themselves to others so that their social value increases. And how do we do that? By asserting the social influence, high level of attractiveness, and material wealth that we have. That way, people will either love us, respect us, or fear us. It’s a tool for attaining social power, and Jeane did precisely that.

Article continues after this advertisement

I initially address the issue of her social networking audience. The readers of Jeane’s blog are her friends in the A community. I’ve never heard of her and her luxurious ways (and I’m pretty sure neither have you) until this scandal blew up. I doubt that she intended poor people to read it, in the first place. They don’t even know who Lacroix or St. Laurent is, and do not understand the social value of a $3,000 designer bag one uses for everyday wear. These posts were specifically targeted toward her own clique, which she intends to rule over as Queen Bee. It’s not an in-your-face, I-have-this-you-don’t statement to the rest of the Filipinos.

FEATURED STORIES

I agree with the point that it would have been all right for her to do what she did had the Napoleses not stolen government money, as they are accused of. My question would then be: Has their guilt been proven by the courts?

If yes, then by all means take away all their money and their privileges. Put the responsible party in jail. The shame would be enough to kill them all. I know it would my family and me. But until then, we should stop judging them just because they’re proud of what they have.

Article continues after this advertisement

If we continue doing so, then why don’t we just save time, money and effort for the judicial system and stone them to death ourselves? We’ve already labeled them as guilty. Why not go the extra mile and punish them as well?

Article continues after this advertisement

We have a judicial system, however slow and flawed it is, for a reason. Let’s leave our judiciary to do the judging.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dear everyone, let’s not get into the hype of hate. Let’s understand where both sides are coming from. We have to be critical, but being critical doesn’t always mean thinking negatively. The media give information, and yes, some opinions, but that doesn’t mean we’re not free to form our own.

Let’s do so with a fair and open mind.

Article continues after this advertisement

Chad Patrick Osorio, 22, is on academic leave from the University of the Philippines College of Law. A former United Nations legal intern in Cambodia, he is now honing his skills as a fashion photographer.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Chad Patrick Osorio, Jeane Napoles, opinion, Young Blood

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.