‘Access’ compromise | Inquirer Opinion

‘Access’ compromise

08:43 PM July 12, 2013

This is in reaction to the news article “Palace defends access plan” (Front Page, 6/29/13). I think, a mutually acceptable solution could be arrived at without violating the Philippine Constitution.

US defense contractors could enter into a joint-venture agreement with Filipino ordnance suppliers to put up an ammunition manufacturing plant in the country, thus making the Philippines a forward arsenal for the Allied Forces in the Pacific Rim.

If a bullet factory is set up in the Philippines, the country would be greatly benefited. For one, Filipino skilled workers would be employed; two, the Philippines would  gain valuable technical knowledge in the production of ammunition of various calibers; three, the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine National Police would have ample supply of bullets.

ADVERTISEMENT

I hold the view that Filipinos ought to develop skills in diplomacy to hone the art of conducting international negotiations. They should also learn by heart how to address conflicts in order to arrive at peaceful resolutions.

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION
OPINION

On the other hand, the Philippines can develop its defense strategies and plans, and strengthen its military capabilities accordingly. Our nation may be likened to a woman who is vulnerable to assault. This will remain so for as long as it does not have credible military capability and police power for self-defense.

—BOB GABUNA,

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: letters

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.