ROC’s reaction to Doro’s column | Inquirer Opinion

ROC’s reaction to Doro’s column

/ 10:56 PM May 31, 2013

I would like to make some important clarifications on the statements made by Amando Doronila in his May 29 column titled “Taiwanese fishermen provoked Coast Guard into firing.”

I would like to reiterate that the May 9 shooting incident that resulted in the death of Hung Shih-chen did not happen in Philippine territorial waters. The shooting incident happened at N 20º, E 123º, 164 nautical miles away from Erluanbi, Taiwan, and 39 nautical miles away from Batanes. As Taiwan and the Philippines have overlapping exclusive economic zones (EEZs), the area where the incident happened is not in Philippine territorial waters. (With this letter was a colored illustration of the incident location.—Ed.)

Doronila was not in any position to misleadingly accuse Guang Da Hsin No. 28 and its crew members of “provoking the Coast Guards in firing” and “poaching.” The fact that this did not happen in Philippine territorial waters attests that Doronila’s accusations of provocations and poaching are totally groundless and biased.

Article continues after this advertisement

I would also like to note that the incident Doronila cited about an “attack on a Filipino worker by a gang of youths wielding baseball bats” has been resolved by the local authorities in Hsinchu County. The conflict was not, in any way, connected to race or nationality. The incident arose because the teenagers thought they were mocked and stared at by the overseas Filipino workers, and the case went to the police, who transferred it to the district prosecutor’s office where apologies were made and a settlement was reached in the amount of NTD120,000.

FEATURED STORIES

There is a rule of law in the Republic of China (Taiwan). OFWs are well-protected by the laws in Taiwan. In fact, our government has pledged to do all the necessary measures to protect the wellbeing of OFWs.

I hope that Doronila has respect for the rule of law, especially international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Paragraph 1 of Article 73 of the convention states that actions that may be taken by a state while enforcing the law in its EEZ are limited to boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings. On the other hand, Paragraph 3 of that same Article provides that coastal states may not undertake corporal punishment, of which killing is the most extreme type. Shooting and killing are not allowed under any circumstances.

Article continues after this advertisement

I write this letter to ensure that Doronila’s speculations, laden with details from unverified reports and hearsays, are clarified so as not to mislead Inquirer readers. It is unfortunate that he was not fully informed of the situation before writing his article.

Article continues after this advertisement

—PONG CHANG,

Article continues after this advertisement

director, Press Division,

Taipei Economic and Cultural

Article continues after this advertisement

Office in the Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Shooting, Taiwan, territorial dispute, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.