Day after delirium | Inquirer Opinion
Viewpoint

Day after delirium

“Ah, the chill of consciousness returns,” the poetic drunk Uncle Seamus would groan after a bender the night before. Morning after the May 13 elections, what do we wake up to?

The wife and I glimpsed the first outlines of reality emerging in Precinct No. 513A at Lahug Elementary School. This Cebu City classroom, turned into a voting booth, is replicated countrywide.

We’ve voted in this precinct since 1994, after retiring from United Nations posts in Bangkok and Rome. Gray hair and bifocals opened the senior citizens’ lane for us. After 30 minutes, we shoved our filled-out ballots into a PCOS machine. It worked.

Article continues after this advertisement

So, why does this queasy feeling persist? Half a century of journalism drills one lesson: the significant story festers below the obvious.

FEATURED STORIES

Underneath Lahug’s placid surface, Rep. Tomas Osmeña pulled out all the stops to achieve what he never managed in two decades: to topple councilor Mary Ann de los Santos, known for spine and guts. Will today’s computer count award De los Santos’ scalp to Osmeña?

Candidates ignored maternal deaths and abortions. We’ve been swamped with posters and texts from those against “Team Patay.” But Sri Lanka and Honduras slashed maternal deaths far below ours. Abortions exceed probably 500,000 a year. It is harsh to say campaigners turned a blind eye to the massacre of innocents and a deaf ear to the death rattle in the throats of mothers. But it is true.

Article continues after this advertisement

No one hit the alarm button over a crucial red line breached last Friday. The level of carbon dioxide—a key heat-trapping gas—breached 400 parts per million.

Article continues after this advertisement

CO2 in the air has not been this high for three million years, says National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Pieter Tans. That was before we humans evolved. It flags climate havoc.

Article continues after this advertisement

Rising sea levels could uproot 13.6 million Filipinos in 2050, the Asian Development Bank estimates. The severest threat is “along the Pacific seaboard: from Samar to eastern Mindanao,” scientist Wendy Clavano wrote. High-risk provinces flank Lingayen Gulf, Camotes Sea, Guimaras Strait, waters along Sibuyan and central Sulu, plus bays in Iligan, Lamon and Bislig.

The new CO2 report came from analyzers atop a Hawaiian volcano. Mauna Loa is ground zero for tracking CO2. “The time to do something was yesterday,” says Yale geochemist Mark Pagani. But no candidate mentioned available climate mitigation programs.

Article continues after this advertisement

Instead, names peddled at every turn are younger editions of old dynasties. These monopolized and largely misruled power over the decades.

Dynasties have become more brazen, Inquirer’s Solita Monsod notes. Examples include the Angaras of Aurora; the Estradas—Erap, son Jinggoy, candidate JV, Mayor Guia Gomez (widely known as Erap’s No. 2). The Cayetano family boasts of three members in politics. The Binays will have four.

Boxing superstar champion Manny Pacquiao raised the hand of unqualified wife Jinkee for vice governor. Next door, his brother is running for Congress. Mommy or “Aling Dionisia” always had better sense. Did she decline?

The 169 political dynasties “make up 0.00001667 percent of the country’s over 15 million families,” an earlier study, by political analyst Roland Simbulan, notes, pointing out that they’ve hoarded  power for the past 30 years, churning out seven presidents, two vice presidents, 42 senators and 147 congressmen.

Today, the dynasties are up in numbers—178. They dominate 73 of the 80 provinces. Remnants of the Arroyo-Macapagal clan remain. The Marcoses seek to reinforce rehabilitation from People Power exile. Imelda’s 1,089 pairs of shoes are shrugged aside in her reelection campaign. The unopposed Ilocos Norte gubernatorial candidate Imee is never asked about her SALN and undeclared Virgin Island secret stash. The former dictator’s namesake Ferdinand Jr. is  a senator; he casts a moist eye on 2016.

Clans today no longer settle for fielding two or three family members in each election. Members of the Ampatuan family and guards were implicated in the 2009 Maguindanao massacre that killed 32 journalists. Today, 80 Ampatuans seek public office.

Political inbreeding embeds penury, Asian Institute of Management’s Ronald Mendoza told AFP. Poverty levels in areas ruled by dynasties are 5 percentage points worse than in those that are represented by politicians without family links. Electing politicians from a constricted gene pool shreds “the potential of countless other talents.”

Seven out of every 10 members of the House of Representatives sport a political dynasty tag, Mendoza pointed out. The total bolts to 80 percent in the Senate. Dynasties rule regions like fiefdoms over generations. They clamp strangleholds on economies and political structures.

When PCOS machines tally all votes today, 21 of the 24 Senate seats could slump under the control of political families, some forecast. “That includes former President Joseph Estrada’s two sons from different mothers.”

After voting, the wife and I pulled up at the Cebu post office’s front steps. That’s where the beggar Raul parks on holidays—and nights. The wife hands Raul something for lunch.

“As suggested by Mareng Winnie, we did not vote for anyone whose surname is the same as, and/or who is related to, an incumbent public official,” we told Raul. “What about you?”

“Me?” he replied: “I stopped voting years ago.” As the drunk Uncle Seamus would groan after a night-before-bender: “Ah, the chill of consciousness returns.”

* * *

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

E-mail: [email protected]

TAGS: column, Elections, Juan L. Mercado, political dynasty, politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.