Close  

2-for-1 JBC seat ‘incomprehensible’

/ 11:09 PM July 27, 2012

My lawyer friends who dabble as law professors in Constitutional Law—and who tend more to be low-key and subdued—could not suppress their disgust and utter astonishment at the proposition that the one slot for Congress (and certainly, only one vote) in the Judicial and Bar Council can be represented by two members of the legislative body and can cast two votes. They say there is no ambiguity in the constitutional provision that all the components of the membership of the council are limited to only one representative (from each sector).

My take is that they are absolutely correct and indisputably so. Cynics and legal prestidigitators may advance the absurd argument that if indeed the two representatives of Congress may still sit as JBC members and logically are entitled to one-half vote each, then there is no restraining Congress from sending 20 of their ilk, and it’s easy math to count their votes as 1/20 of the cherished one unit vote from their sector. Absolutely ridiculous, totally incomprehensible and (il)logical!

ADVERTISEMENT

—JOSÉ AGUILA GRAPILON,

national president,

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Integrated Bar of the Philippines (1997-1999),

[email protected]

Read Next
LATEST STORIES
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: chief justice, JBC, letters, Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2019 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.