2-for-1 JBC seat ‘incomprehensible’ | Inquirer Opinion

2-for-1 JBC seat ‘incomprehensible’

/ 11:09 PM July 27, 2012

My lawyer friends who dabble as law professors in Constitutional Law—and who tend more to be low-key and subdued—could not suppress their disgust and utter astonishment at the proposition that the one slot for Congress (and certainly, only one vote) in the Judicial and Bar Council can be represented by two members of the legislative body and can cast two votes. They say there is no ambiguity in the constitutional provision that all the components of the membership of the council are limited to only one representative (from each sector).

My take is that they are absolutely correct and indisputably so. Cynics and legal prestidigitators may advance the absurd argument that if indeed the two representatives of Congress may still sit as JBC members and logically are entitled to one-half vote each, then there is no restraining Congress from sending 20 of their ilk, and it’s easy math to count their votes as 1/20 of the cherished one unit vote from their sector. Absolutely ridiculous, totally incomprehensible and (il)logical!

—JOSÉ AGUILA GRAPILON,

Article continues after this advertisement

national president,

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Integrated Bar of the Philippines (1997-1999),

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: chief justice, JBC, letters, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.