outbrain
Close  

Jury system better, balanced

/ 10:08 PM June 14, 2012

Asuncion David Maramba’s commentary, titled “Fariñas’ plain talk” (Inquirer, 6/4/12) is exactly what most everyone felt. Our intelligence was being insulted and we were being made to believe the unbelievable. If the impeachment trial were tried in a regular court, the legalese, devoid of common sense, would have prevailed and Renato Corona would have been acquitted.

There is a lot of merit in having a jury system, where bribing a judge is more difficult, and unbelievable, ridiculous lawyer language and legalese can be balanced by common sense and a shared sense of justice by the jury members representing a cross-section of the citizenry.

ADVERTISEMENT

—JL YULO,

[email protected]

FEATURED STORIES
OPINION

Read Next
EDITORS' PICK
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: impeachment trial, jury system, legalese, letters, Renato corona
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.