Suppressed evidence admissible defense? | Inquirer Opinion

Suppressed evidence admissible defense?

/ 01:21 AM May 17, 2012

At the impeachment trial, there’s a lady seemingly on the side of Chief Justice Renato Corona. She bawled out a prosecution lawyer and sought to cite him for contempt. But on insinuations made by a defense lawyer, which cast doubts on the integrity of the impeachment court, she made nary a whimper.

Her behavior tells us that to her Renato Corona may be as guilty as hell (which we may not believe in), a miscreant of myriad misdeeds and totally unfit to be a chief justice, but if the evidence against him has been successfully suppressed—act as a bully for him.

Suffering from a life-threatening disease, I’ve begged my cardiologist to keep me alive to see the impeachment trial to be justified.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thank God, Article XI, Section 13 of our Constitution authorizes the Ombudsman to investigate, on its own, complaints against any public official for illegal acts.

FEATURED STORIES

—TERENCE ILES,

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: corona impeachment, justice, laws, Renato corona, Senate, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.