An all forgotten Senate pledge | Inquirer Opinion

An all forgotten Senate pledge

/ 01:40 AM March 05, 2012

Whatever happened to the pledge of the Senate to ask the Supreme Court to withdraw the temporary restraining order barring the opening of the dollar accounts of impeached Chief Justice Renato Corona?

As I understand it from the manifestation of Sen. Chiz Escudero, the Senate voted 13-10 to “respect” the TRO, but the chamber would argue before the Supreme Court that Corona’s dollar accounts must be opened for comparison against the stated cash positions in his statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs).

Better yet, I think the Senate should set aside that earlier vote and just issue another order, this time forcing PSBank officials to just lay bare Corona’s dollar accounts or be jailed for contempt.

Article continues after this advertisement

I am of the conviction that the Supreme Court has no right whatsoever to meddle in the impeachment trial of Corona. After all, its members are all impeachable officials who should not be allowed to save one of its own.

FEATURED STORIES

My thinking is that even in interpreting the law on Foreign Currency Deposit Units (FCDU), the Senate must reign supreme over the Supreme Court when it comes to its applicability in an impeachment case.

For sure, no law, not even the FCDU, is enacted to hide ill-gotten wealth or the fruits of criminal activities. So let the Senate be the judge on whether the FCDU provision on the confidentiality of deposits should be relaxed on the matter of Corona’s accounts.

Article continues after this advertisement

—NOEL LAZARO, lazaron10@yahoo.com

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Congress, corona impeachment, Government, judiciary, politics, Renato corona, Senate, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.