Corona dared: If not hiding ill-gotten wealth, why avoid scrutiny? | Inquirer Opinion

Corona dared: If not hiding ill-gotten wealth, why avoid scrutiny?

/ 07:48 PM February 27, 2012

It is a shame that Chief Justice Renato Corona asked for a temporary restraining order to avoid disclosure of his bank accounts. He is citing the bank secrecy law. But how is he to refute the allegations against him if he keeps on avoiding them? It seems that he resorts to a lot of legalistic manipulations to escape scrutiny.

I believe there is the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) that the Philippines and other countries are committed to. The law deals with illegitimate funds stashed in banks. If indeed the Chief Justice is innocent of the charges hurled against him, then he has nothing to hide. If his “savings” are legitimate, then he should proudly show them and should have included them in his statements of assets, liabilities and net worth.

Another disturbing issue is the continued unsolicited statements coming from non-taxpayers. If they want to influence government, they should pay their taxes first just like the rest of us before ever giving an opinion.

Article continues after this advertisement

—ARTHUR BOQUER,

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: anti-money laundering act, bank secrecy law, corona impeachment, letters

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.