Ayuda is a lifeline, not a political tool

Amid rising prices of food and basic necessities, social amelioration programs—commonly called ayuda—have proven to be a lifeline for millions of Filipinos. 

Surveys from both Social Weather Stations (SWS) and Pulse Asia confirm overwhelming public support for these programs, yet some critics, including economists, continue to demonize them for political gain. This is not only out of touch but also outright elitist.

The recent surveys commissioned by Stratbase Group show that a vast majority of Filipinos find government assistance programs beneficial. According to SWS, 90% of Filipinos say that the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is helpful, while 88% recognize the importance of Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers (TUPAD). The Ayuda sa Kapos ang Kita Program (AKAP) and the Walang Gutom Program (WGP) both received 81% approval ratings.

Pulse Asia’s survey reinforces these findings, showing 82% of Filipinos believe 4Ps improves financial stability for the lower-income sector, and 81% see AKAP as an essential aid for struggling families. These figures highlight a simple truth: ayuda is not just a handout—it’s a necessary intervention in a country where inflation continues to hit the poorest the hardest.

With rice prices soaring and wages barely keeping up with the cost of living, how else are minimum wage earners, contractual workers, and the unemployed supposed to survive?

Despite the clear necessity of these programs, some quarters—including certain economists—continue to frame ayuda as a political gimmick or, worse, as a dependency trap. This is a gross mischaracterization. The reality is that while ayuda programs are products of legislative action, they are implemented by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), not by politicians seeking reelection.

DSWD Secretary Rex Gatchalian has repeatedly defended these programs against accusations that they are a form of pork barrel. The funds are allocated for direct assistance to Filipinos in need—not as a political tool for lawmakers. Critics who claim otherwise either misunderstand the structure of these initiatives or are deliberately misrepresenting them.

Worse, some politicians and analysts dismiss ayuda programs as unsustainable while offering no viable alternatives. If they truly cared about economic stability, they would focus on solutions that address poverty at its root—like raising wages, controlling inflation, and creating more job opportunities. Until wages are raised to respectable levels and until systemic issues are resolved, ayuda remains a critical support system.

Beyond its immediate relief, ayuda also has a ripple effect on the economy. When families have money to spend on food, transportation, and other essentials, they support local businesses, which in turn creates more jobs. Stratbase Group President Dindo Manhit points out that ensuring the effective implementation of these programs is not just about welfare—it’s about economic progress.

But for ayuda to work efficiently, transparency must be a priority. While DSWD has taken steps to ensure fair distribution, corruption remains a legitimate concern. Strengthening monitoring mechanisms and implementing digital payment systems can help eliminate leakages and ensure that funds go to those who need them most. 

The strong public support for ayuda is a direct slap in the face of those who oppose it on ideological grounds. The surveys show that Filipinos do not see these programs as a crutch, but as a necessary tool to survive in an economy that often fails the poor.

If critics are truly concerned about the nation’s future, they should channel their energy into advocating for better economic policies instead of shaming the poor for needing assistance. Until then, ayuda remains not just popular—but indispensable.

VP Duterte’s Impeachment Trial:  A Public Demand 

As the nation approaches new political milestones, the emerging tide of public support for Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment is not just a reflection of dissatisfaction with her actions; it signifies a broader demand for accountability that transcends party lines and regional loyalties. Recent surveys indicate a stark reality—the public appetite for transparency is growing hungrier, and the evidence against Duterte weighs heavily in this discourse.

The statistics are compelling.  53 percent of respondents believe VP Sara Duterte should face a Senate impeachment trial while 30 percent disagree on her alleged threat to hire someone to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos and Speaker Martin Romualdez, according to a Tangere research firm 

Half of the respondents or 51 percent agree that Duterte should also be investigated for alleged discrepancies in her Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN), while 33 percent oppose the charge.

A recent Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey highlights that 41% of Filipinos now back the prospect of impeachment, surpassing those who oppose it (35%) and leaving a notable portion of undecided voters swirling in uncertainty (19%).  This marked shift signifies an awakening among citizens who feel increasingly disenchanted with the status quo, especially considering allegations surrounding the mishandling of an excessive P612.5 million in confidential funds linked to both her office and the Department of Education under her command. The disturbing revelations—indicating potential misuse and irregularities—have understandably sparked outrage.  

Make no mistake: these numbers are a clarion call for justice. Legislative figures reflecting on these opinions have noted that the Filipino populace is demanding answers not merely as a reaction to political theatre, but as fundamental citizens advocating for their rights. As House officials pointed out, “The numbers don’t lie.” There exists an undeniable correlation between the decline in the Vice President’s approval ratings in the OCTA survey—from a respectable 59% last year to a troubling 49% today—and the swelling calls for accountability. Notably, these figures mark the lowest recorded since December 2023, indicating widespread public distrust.  

Supporters of Duterte may hastily argue that she retains the backing of 32 million voters, but such claims ring hollow considering tangible evidence of malfeasance. How does one reconcile claims of enduring popularity against the stark evidence of public distrust, as demonstrated by poll results showing overwhelming disapproval from critical areas? In the heart of Mindanao, traditionally supportive territory for the Dutertes, disapproval rates are surging, although majority still oppose her impeachment.  On record, 43 out of 61 Congressmen from Mindanao signed the impeachment complaint. An unsettling political situation from the very region that bolstered VP Sara’s ascent now appears to be turning its back amid burgeoning discontent.  

Equally disturbing is the Senate leadership’s reticence to initiate impeachment proceedings—an action constitutionally mandated without excuse. Using the upcoming May 2025 elections as a shield, they risk tarnishing the already fragile credibility of the legislative body they represent. The postponement of the impeachment trial only perpetuates public cynicism, adding to a narrative that suggests a deliberate abdication of their constitutional obligations. The Senate’s failure to act decisively raises pressing questions about their commitment to uphold democratic processes.  

In the eyes of many, the continued delay represents gross negligence; the Constitution outlines a clear path for such accusations to be addressed head-on. Behind closed doors, some Senators may cower in fear of negative repercussions for their political futures, but the stakes are far greater than personal ambition. It is high time the Senate recognizes their role as stewards of justice and accountability—a role they seem intent on evading at the expense of the constituents they vowed to serve.  

The increasing calls for Duterte to face trial should not be dismissed lightly; instead, they must be embraced as an opportunity for reflection and institutional reform. The Filipino electorate is no longer passive; they are vocal, engaged, and determined to hold the powerful accountable. Amid the shifting sands of public opinion, one truth prevails—demanding accountability isn’t simply a trend; it is the cornerstone of democracy.

One truth remains unwavering: the people will not sit idly by as their democratic rights are trampled. It is time for the Senate to rise to the occasion and embody the principles of justice that we Filipinos so rightfully expects and deserves.