Elections play a vital role in allowing individuals in a democratic society to actively participate in the governance of their country. When people go to the polls, they are not only selecting a candidate but also entering into a social contract with that candidate. This social contract is built on the promises, proposals, and initiatives that the candidate pledges to carry out once in office. These commitments essentially become the terms and conditions of the agreement between elected officials and the voters who backed them during the election.
For instance, in the course of an election campaign, a candidate might vow to implement policies aimed at reducing unemployment, enhancing health care, and fostering economic growth. These assurances form the cornerstone of the social contract between the candidate and the electorate. By casting their vote for a specific candidate, individuals are essentially holding that candidate responsible for delivering on their promises once they assume office.
It is imperative for voters to thoroughly assess which candidate presents the most compelling social contract for governing the nation. This enables voters to make well-informed decisions based on the platforms and promises presented by candidates. By choosing those whose platforms resonate with the needs and aspirations of the populace, voters actively participate in shaping the course of their country’s future.
Nevertheless, in order for the social contract to remain valid, it is crucial that voters refrain from selling their votes, while candidates abstain from buying them. Practices like vote-buying and gift-giving epitomize mercenary politics, which erodes the integrity of the social contract. In a system where votes are traded for favors or financial gain, there exists no authentic social contract between elected officials and the governed.
Moreover, the potential risk of a shift toward a mercenary government system is a legitimate concern. This type of government may prioritize recovering campaign expenses over serving the public, leading to elected officials focusing more on appeasing powerful interest groups rather than fulfilling their promises to the electorate.
It is essential for both elected officials and citizens to uphold the terms of the social contract. Elected officials have a duty to diligently carry out the promises and proposals they put forth during their election campaigns. Their primary focus should be on the welfare of the citizens they represent and acting in the best interest of the nation.
In the same vein, it is crucial for citizens to hold their elected officials accountable for delivering on their commitments. By staying well-informed, engaging in fruitful discussions, and actively participating in the democratic process, individuals can help maintain a robust and meaningful social contract between elected representatives and the public.
Both elected officials and the voters who put them in power have a duty to fulfill their respective roles, and strive toward a government that truly represents the desires and goals of the people. Through this mutual commitment, we can establish a more resilient, transparent, and responsible democratic framework that benefits everyone.
Reginald B. Tamayo,
Marikina City