Treading the fine line that separates church and state

Some believe that bishops should avoid politics and focus on matters of faith and spirituality. Others argue that bishops have a duty to speak out on issues that impact society’s moral values.

Catholic bishops consistently emphasize that there is no such thing as a “Catholic vote.” They do not endorse candidates or support politicians during elections. However, they do assert their moral authority on issues that conflict with Church teachings and Gospel values. There are certain nonnegotiable issues that bishops refuse to compromise on due to their conflict with Catholic moral teachings.

As the midterm election approaches, it is important for bishops to guide Catholic voters on how to wisely use their right to choose the country’s next leaders. Bishops may highlight the importance of voting for candidates whose government programs align with Catholic faith and morals. However, it is important to remember that the bishops are not telling Catholics who to vote for, but rather urging them to consider the implications of their choices on the well-being of society as a whole. In a world where political rhetoric can become divisive and polarizing, the bishops serve as a moral compass, reminding Catholics of the values they hold dear.

Critics may argue that bishops are overstepping their boundaries by getting involved in politics. However, it’s important to understand that the issues at hand are not just political, but also deeply moral. Catholic social teaching emphasizes that every person has inherent dignity and worth, and it’s the government’s duty to protect and uphold this dignity. Is it fair to criticize bishops for trying to protect their followers from what they view as negative influences in politics? Is it wrong for them to engage with politicians whose proposals contradict Church teachings? Bishops have a duty to speak out against unjust laws or policies that could harm the greater good or conflict with Catholic principles. In doing so, they act as guides leading their followers away from harm.

The bishops stress the importance of voting based on one’s conscience, which aligns with Catholic teaching. The Church acknowledges the significance of individual conscience in making moral decisions, including voting. While the bishops may provide guidance, it is ultimately up to each person to make their own choices based on their conscience. However, this focus on conscience can lead to a paradox. On one hand, bishops and clergy discourage voting solely based on party affiliation or popularity, encouraging Catholics to carefully consider candidates and their positions on important issues. On the other hand, this emphasis on conscience allows individuals the freedom to choose candidates even if their policies go against Catholic teachings.

This paradox becomes more noticeable when politicians who claim to be practicing Catholics support policies that go against Catholic teachings. This inconsistency can cause confusion and conflict for Catholic voters who may struggle to reconcile their religious beliefs with their political views. Given these complexities, it is understandable why some may believe that there is no unified Catholic vote in the traditional sense. While the Church offers guidance, each person is ultimately responsible for making their own choices in the voting booth. This freedom of choice, essential to democracy, can result in differing opinions and outcomes among Catholic voters.

The concept of voting based on one’s conscience is a difficult challenge for Catholic voters. The Church stresses the need for careful thought and reflection when selecting candidates, but ultimately, individuals have the freedom to make their own choices based on their personal beliefs and values. This conflict between guidance and independence highlights the complexities of balancing religion and politics in a democratic society.

REGINALD B. TAMAYO,
Marikina City