With the advent of historical revisionism, Filipinos are confronted with so many doubts and questions. Generations new and old are in constant struggle as to who holds the truth. Every historical fact becomes a matter of debate.
Today, as we commemorate his death anniversary, let us reflect on the following what-ifs and questions about Jose Rizal.
If Rizal did not die for our country on Dec. 30, 1896, and he succeeded as a volunteer doctor in Cuba, would the Philippines still have gained independence from Spain?
If Rizal agreed to the Katipunan’s plan to rescue him from execution, would he have become a key figure in Philippine history?
If Rizal’s son survived, what could have happened both to father and son?
If Rizal did not die early, would he have become the President of the Philippines?
Rizal’s retraction is still a matter of debate. If it’s true that he retracted, does that mean Rizal has no intellectual integrity?
Rizal’s marriage to Josephine Bracken is still in question. Their marriage certificate was never produced. If they were indeed married, does that mean Rizal re-embraced his Catholic faith?
Many Filipinos believe that Rizal wanted the Philippines to remain a province of Mother Spain. If he didn’t die in 1896, would he have supported Philippine independence in 1898?
If Rizal is still alive today, do you think he can win as the president of the Republic of the Philippines?
Lastly, if we fulfill Rizal’s request that we don’t celebrate his death anniversary, how can we promote the life and legacy of the country’s foremost hero?
RADO GATCHALIAN
Order of the Knights of Rizal Sydney, Australia
Rado.Gatchalian@aristocrat.com