A New Deal for informal workers | Inquirer Opinion
Close  
World View

A New Deal for informal workers

/ 05:01 AM May 01, 2021

Cambridge—In the early 1930s, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced the New Deal in an attempt to combat the effects of the Great Depression. The program had three main pillars: Relief (for the unemployed), recovery (of the economy and job creation), and reform (through new regulations and social-welfare programs).

The COVID-19 crisis presents an opportunity for another New Deal—one that recognizes, protects, and supports informal workers, who comprise 61 percent of the global workforce but have no health insurance, paid sick leave, or pensions. Most of these workers produce essential goods such as food, milk, clothing, shoes, and housing, or provide crucial services like health care, childcare, eldercare, cleaning, delivery, transport, waste management, and food distribution.

ADVERTISEMENT

The indispensable nature of these jobs, which the pandemic has highlighted, calls for a strategy with the same three pillars that FDR championed—relief, recovery, and reform—but all aimed at helping informal workers. Yet, many aspects of governments’ current COVID-19 recovery measures threaten informal workers.

In early 2020, the International Labor Organization predicted that the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns would destroy or undermine the livelihoods of 80 percent of the global informal workforce, or 1.6 billion workers. Similarly, a study of 12 cities around the world by Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (Wiego) found that 70 percent of informal workers surveyed had zero earnings during peak lockdowns. Many therefore had to reduce expenditures, deplete savings, mortgage or sell assets, and go deeper into debt, handicapping their economic recovery prospects.

FEATURED STORIES

The Wiego study also found that governments’ COVID-19 relief responses have been weak and uneven, reflecting preexisting fault lines in social policies and social protection. Governments tend to favor corporations and formal enterprises over the informal economy when lifting or easing restrictions. But why should shopping malls be allowed to reopen when street markets are not? Why should restaurants, but not street vendors, be allowed to use sidewalks and parking bays to serve food? Worse, many governments are using the COVID-19 crisis as a pretext to arrest informal workers, evict them from streets, landfills, and public spaces, and destroy their equipment. Policymakers are also pushing through measures intended to suppress informal workers and the activities that provide their livelihoods.

Moreover, there is growing evidence that governments’ pandemic relief funds and stimulus packages are being captured by economic elites—not by the unemployed or small-

business owners for whom they were intended, much less the informal workers at the base of the economic pyramid. The international community needs to recognize that the private and public sectors combined account for less than half of all jobs globally and just under 20 percent of economic units. Why not pump relief and recovery funds into the broad base of the economic pyramid rather than the tip—and build a just recovery from below?

The world is facing an existential crisis that poses fundamental questions about whether to put people and nature ahead of owners of capital and technology, and whether to protect the rights of the disadvantaged or the interests of the political and economic elite. This is a defining moment: Will the global community follow the worldwide call for social and economic justice?

A New Deal for informal workers is vital in order to challenge the racial and economic injustices exposed and exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. It must confront the dominant narratives that stigmatize informal workers as a problem. And it should start with two fundamental commitments that do not require significant financial resources, but rather a change in mindset.

The first is to do no harm. Governments should stop harassing, evicting, and expropriating informal workers whose very lives have been threatened during the crisis. As informal workers around the world lamented during the height of the COVID-19 lockdowns: “We will die of hunger, not the virus.”

The second commitment should be “nothing about us without us.” Governments should regard informal workers as legitimate economic actors and invite their leaders to the table when discussing and planning relief, recovery, and reforms.

ADVERTISEMENT

If all national leaders and intergovernmental agencies honor these commitments, the world can overcome the COVID-19 crisis in a way that ensures a better, more just future for all. Project Syndicate

—————-

Marty Chen is senior adviser at Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing and lecturer in public policy at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link .

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Chen, COVID-19, ILO, Workers, World View
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.