Arrest without warrant is essentially martial law | Inquirer Opinion

Arrest without warrant is essentially martial law

/ 04:01 AM June 23, 2020

Arrest without warrant, detention without being charged, is the essence of martial law. The late senator Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel Jr. famously said that he was twice arrested by martial law enforcers but he did not know why.

The anti-terrorism law authorizes arrest without warrant by a court, but merely on the personal determination of the arresting officer. No application for warrant of arrest and no judicial action to issue the warrant of arrest are needed.

The arresting officer reports to the court after the arrest, but the court will decide whether the detention should continue, not pass upon the legality of the arrest without warrant. The offense of arrest without court warrant is erased from criminal law.

Article continues after this advertisement

The arresting officer reports to the court the detention of the citizen and may ask the court for 14 days detention plus 10 more days—or the sum total of 24 days in detention!

FEATURED STORIES

The saying, “Work expands to fill the time available,” gives the arresting officer the luxury of time to investigate the case. The burden of the arresting officer to justify the arrest without warrant is shifted to the person detained, who now has the burden to convince the court to void his detention.

JOSE J. FERRER JR
[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: anti-terrorism bill, Jose J. Ferrer Jr., Letters to the Editor, martial law, warrantless arrests

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.