Sloppy record valuation stops retiree’s pension | Inquirer Opinion

Sloppy record valuation stops retiree’s pension

/ 02:57 AM September 26, 2011

May I call the attention of GSIS chair Daniel L. Lacson Jr. and GSIS president Robert G. Vergara.

I am a 75-year-old, poverty-stricken, illness-prone retiree, a beneficiary under the Old-Age Pension program of the Government Service Insurance System. I am vehemently protesting the sudden, unannounced GSIS decision to stop the payment of my monthly pension effective this month of September for the very unconscionable, if whimsical, excuse of a practice(?)/policy(?)—a carryover perhaps from the past unlamented administration?—to the effect that a “GSIS pensioner of my namesake has just died.” I was personally told of this news/excuse only on Sept. 9, 2011 by a GSIS employee at the Pensioners’ Section of the GSIS branch in Cebu City, where I went to inquire. The employee even gave me a blank form to fill up in affirmation of the fact that I—Erlinda Villafuerte Semilla—am still alive!

I consider the “decision” very unconscionable because my meager P7,000+ monthly pension is our main source of sustenance, including hardly affordable, costly geriatric health care. And to think that I am being deprived of this small benefit due me in the twilight of my life after dedicating my best years to public health nursing service. I also think that the “decision” is rather absurd and questionable—and borders on “administrative indiscretion”—in this modern age of advanced digital technology. Because, if the GSIS had only bothered to conscientiously surf the files of its multimillion-peso worth of costly, state-of-the-art, hi-tech computerized system to see my GSIS 201 file, for verification purposes, then it could have readily found out that my deceased pensioner namesake could never have the same: (1) full name (i.e., first, middle, last name, as listed above); (2) date of birth (i.e., day, month, year); (3) place of birth (i.e., street/sitio, barangay, town/city, province); (4) full name of father and mother (i.e., first, middle, family name); (5) postal address, among other data available in my 201 file. But the GSIS chose to cavalierly “shoot-first-before-asking”—Poor me!—causing this rickety septuagenarian retiree undue emotional stress.

Article continues after this advertisement

Please investigate immediately this matter for corrective/remedial purposes and for humanitarian consideration, as well as in the interest of justice and equity, not only for me but for others who may be similarly affected—in consonance with President Aquino’s “Pagbabago sa matuwid na daan.”

—ERLINDA V. SEMILLA, RN, 36060800175, Retirement # AD14898; [email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, GSIS, Pensions

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.