Pinoy Kasi

Who are we?

/ 04:06 AM October 23, 2019

Vibal Publishing is probably better known for its excellent and innovative textbooks. Less known are its Academica Filipina series with intriguing titles: “More Hispanic Than We Admit” (volume 1 already out of print, with a volume 2 out now), “More Tsinoy Than We Admit” (Tsinoy being Chinese-Filipino), “More Islamic Than We Admit” and “More Pinay Than We Admit.”

Except for the “Pinay” book, which concentrates on gender, all the others are useful reads as we ask ourselves: Who are we?


We are still a people in search of ourselves, a relatively young nation going back to our declaration of independence in 1898, with interruptions because of the American and Japanese colonial occupations.

In the 19th century, following European scholars, we thought of our origins mainly in racial terms. Rizal was among those searching for racial origins, although he was actually quite inclusive when he and others first expropriated the term “filipino” from its original meaning of Spaniards born in the Philippines, to apply to more people — Spaniards born in the Philippines, Spanish mestizos, Chinese mestizos and, most importantly, the indios (“natives,” who formed the majority).


As we fought to regain our independence from the Americans, we began to use identity tags like the “Malay race,” and sometimes even the “Filipino race.” It did not help that H. Otley Beyer, one of the pioneer anthropologists in the Philippines, popularized a 19th-century theory that talked of waves of migration to the Philippines of the Negritos, Indonesians and Malays.

It is a theory now debunked, because the archaeological evidence does not support these so-called migratory waves. The terms used tend to be racial, suggesting Negritos were the first to arrive in the islands, with connotations of their being the most “primitive,” followed by supposedly more advanced Indonesians and Malays. The terms are inaccurate, “Indonesian” being a Western geographer’s name for the region, adopted only later in the 20th century by nationalists creating a new nation.

In more recent times, we have seen the emergence of what is sometimes called ethnonationalism, the creation of some kind of ethnicity (“Filipino”) but often defined as being “anti”: anti-American, anti-Japanese, anti-Chinese.

Let me be clear here: There is good reason to protest against the economic and social injustices propagated by any nationality, whether visiting tourists or big businesses, but we cannot continue to define ourselves in these “anti” terms. That, then, becomes xenophobia or an irrational fear of foreigners. It also becomes scapegoating, blaming all our problems on foreigners.

There have been many instances of this ethnonationalism, from trying to rename the Philippines (because we were named after a Spanish king) to purging our Filipino language of any word of foreign vintage, a movement in the 1960s. There have been also all kinds of discriminatory laws; for example, it was practically impossible before 1973 for ethnic Chinese, even those born and raised in the Philippines, to become Filipino citizens.

Vibal’s publications remind us there is so much more to discover and celebrate in what makes the Filipino: a lively, if not sometimes chaotic, blend of cultures that is reflected in the most basic aspects of our lives, such as what we eat, what we wear, even what we think.

Think of the diversity even in terms of religion. As we move toward the 500th anniversary of Christianity in the Philippines, we might think of that Christianity as Hispanic. And so it is, but we find, too, in this so-called Hispanic religion the imprints of other cultures, including Islam, because Spain was heavily influenced by Islamic culture, particularly in architecture and music.


I hope Vibal comes up with more volumes in the “more than we admit” series. Might a “More American” volume(s) be in the works? There’s more, too, than World War II if we want a “More Japanese” volume.

Definitely, we need a “More Austronesian” title, which could take more than one volume, to understand our being part of an Austronesian world—from our precolonial past and extending to the present, with affinities to cultures in present-day Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia and other parts of the Asia-Pacific.

A plug to end today’s column: Catch the 2019 Sikat Pinoy National Arts and Crafts Fair on Oct. 24-27 at Megatrade Hall, SM Megamall in Mandaluyong. Started a few years ago by Rep. Loren Legarda, the fair is now a big event attracting small- and medium-scale businesses from all over the country. They don’t just sell but project with pride our crafts to help us realize we are more, much more, than we admit!

[email protected]

Subscribe to Inquirer Opinion Newsletter
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Academica Filipina, Michael tan, National identity, Pinoy Kasi, Vibal Publishing
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.