‘Day of infamy’ | Inquirer Opinion

‘Day of infamy’

05:02 AM May 16, 2018

Shock is the mildest word to describe how we feel after eight members of the Supreme Court voted to oust the Chief Justice in a manner which the Constitution does not provide.

But it was not unexpected as they have already expressed early on their personal dislike for their chief for whom they harbor envy, grudge and spite.

Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa put it succinctly when he said that, “No matter how dislikable a member of the Court is, the rules cannot be changed just to get rid of him, or her in this case.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The eight associate justices including the “shameless five” (who even had the nerve to appear before the House committee on justice which was deliberating on the impeachment complaint filed before it by a publicity-seeking lawyer who served as an attack dog of this creeping conspiracy), have displayed utter disregard for the Constitution which they were supposed to defend, protect and uphold.

FEATURED STORIES

What baffled us most was the judgment of Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza who in our view should know more about the Constitution than the other seven, being a professor of constitutional law at the UP College of Law.

How can he expect his students there to believe what he teaches them now?

Article continues after this advertisement

Persons who have been appointed as judges and justices should live a life detached from society. This is exemplified by the image of Lady Justice who is blindfolded so as not to distinguish between friend or foe, but see only the truth and be fair and just at all times.

Article continues after this advertisement

They should live like the life of a “celibate” as the priests in the Catholic Church. But some of them have been seen and photographed socializing with politicians and persons with vested interests and have been known to have connections with persons who appointed them to positions in the judiciary.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Members of the Court cannot and should not allow themselves to be used in ousting a sitting member upon the prodding of a mere agency of a separate coordinate department,” wrote Caguioa.

He must be referring to the “marching order” of President Duterte who expressed his anger at Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno where he said that “I am now your enemy.”

Article continues after this advertisement

That fateful May 11, 2018, will be remembered in the history of this country as the “day of infamy,” the day when eight members of the highest court of the land conceded to the power of a coequal branch of government and spelled the death of democracy in this benighted land.

Shame on you, eight associate justices!

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RAMON MAYUGA, [email protected]

TAGS: Benjamin Caguioa, Francis Jardeleza, Inquirer letters, Maria Lourdes Sereno, quo warranto petition, Ramon Mayuga, Sereno impeachment, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.