No ‘RevGov’ | Inquirer Opinion

No ‘RevGov’

/ 05:10 AM November 22, 2017

There is no legal authority that allows the President of the Philippines to declare a revolutionary government. If President Duterte were to do that, he would be abandoning the 1987 Constitution that established the system over which he presides and governed the elections that brought him to the presidency.

Former Solicitor General Florin Hilbay offers the right perspective on the revolutionary government option. If the President insists on using it, the right (that is constitutional) response is to recognize that Mr. Duterte has abandoned his office, to swear in the Vice President as the rightful successor, and for everyone in the constitutional order to follow the new president.


The President has said the entire system of government needs to be changed. “For the Philippines to really go up, I said: What the people need is not martial law. Go for what Cory did — revolutionary government.”

But if he wants to change the system, President Duterte must follow the Constitution’s own procedure.


Article XVII allows three modes of changing the constitutional order: through a constituent assembly, through a Constitutional Convention, or through a people’s initiative.

If there is a genuine popular clamor for a thorough revamp of the system of government, the third option looks like an appropriate medium: amending or revising the Constitution “upon a petition of at least twelve per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein.”

Previous attempts to mobilize so-called supporters of the revolutionary government option or “RevGov” have fizzled out, however; the next one, ironically enough, is scheduled for Nov. 30, the day the country honors the memory of the founder of the Katipunan and the father of the Philippine Revolution. Ironic, because the supposed popular support for RevGov looks decidedly artificial.

If he wants to assume more powers, President Duterte must again follow the Constitution’s own procedure.

His commander in chief powers are provided for in Article VII, Section 18, a lengthy provision that starts, thus: “The President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of all armed forces of the Philippines and whenever it becomes necessary, he may call out such armed forces to prevent or suppress lawless violence, invasion or rebellion. In case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it, he may, for a period not exceeding sixty days, suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus or place the Philippines or any part thereof under martial law.”

This is important, because the President’s reasons for declaring a revolutionary government fall under this provision.

“’Pag ang destabilization ninyo patagilid na and medyo magulo na (If your destabilization attempt is worsening and it has become somewhat chaotic), I will not hesitate to declare a revolutionary government until the end of my term, and I will arrest all of you and we can go to a full-scale war against the Reds,” the President has said.


Even if one assumes that the destabilization threat is real and imminent (in fact, the security agencies say they have not monitored any destabilization moves), the legal option open to him is to invoke his commander in chief powers. To be sure, these powers are delimited by congressional and Supreme Court oversight. That’s the price we pay, the lesson we learned, from the excesses of one-man rule.

And even if one assumes that the task of ridding the country of pervasive corruption and wholesale criminality is as serious as the President says (in fact, the statistics from different government agencies paint a varied picture), the legal option open to him is to invoke the powers granted to him by the Constitution.

“I have to stop criminality and corruption. I have to fix this government. I won’t do it if you want to place me there with the solemn pledge to stick to the rules,” Mr. Duterte said when he was testing the waters for a presidential run.

That’s his dilemma. He needs to stop criminality and corruption and fix the government, but he needs to do so by sticking to the rules.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, Florin Hilbay, Inquirer editorial, RevGov, revolutionary government, Rodrigo Duterte
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2022 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.