Verbose but evasive

05:02 AM November 20, 2017

I find the recently made “Joint Statement of the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China” as — by far — the most magnanimous reiteration of what is purported to be the core of PH-Sino mutual understanding and benefit.

But reading through the items that cover the West Philippine Sea, I find it incredible how a carefully crafted verbosity could conceal the apparent evasion of the parties to undertake concrete and workable solutions. As a staunch advocate of our jurisdiction over said territory, I was actually expecting a more categorical assertion by the two states on the matter instead of just settling with equivocal abstractions of “confidence building,” “mutual trust and confidence,” and “self-restraint,” all of which China has been notoriously known to have acted in contrary to.


While it could be argued that a Joint Statement is not the proper medium to concretize plans of action over the West Philippine Sea, both parties should have at least been a little more unequivocal on the matter.

“Continued discussions” or talks over the West Philippine Sea, as mentioned in the Joint Statement, are good. Nonetheless, concrete yet peaceable actions are otherwise way better.


MONICA TURARAY, [email protected]

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Inquirer Letter, Maritime Dispute, Monica Turaray, South China Sea, West Philippine Sea
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.