Slow, lingering boats from China | Inquirer Opinion
Editorial

Slow, lingering boats from China

/ 05:10 AM August 23, 2017

On Aug. 15, Magdalo party-list Rep. Gary Alejano revealed that a small flotilla of Chinese vessels, including two ships of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), was conducting unusual operations in the waters off Pag-asa Island, the largest Philippine-occupied feature in the Spratlys.

On Aug. 19, Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio sounded the alarm, specifically about Chinese occupation of a sandbar in those waters.

“Sandy Cay is a Philippine land territory that is being seized (to put it mildly) or being invaded (to put it frankly) by China,” said the jurist, who was instrumental in the landmark arbitral tribunal case the Philippines won against China.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This means China is now virtually occupying a new geologic feature within the territorial sea of Pag-asa, a Philippine territory, in clear violation of China’s supposed vow not to occupy any more islands in the Spratlys,” he said. “By any yardstick, this is seizure of Philippine territory.”

FEATURED STORIES

On Aug. 20, National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr. denied that any sandbars had been occupied. “China has not seized sandbars in Pag-asa Atoll,” Esperon said. “There should be no alarm on that as long as they don’t occupy any of the sandbars. There are many Chinese as well as Vietnamese fishing boats in and near Pag-asa Island and its nearby sandbars, collectively called Pag-asa Atoll.”

On Aug. 21, President Duterte simultaneously denied that an invasion had taken place and signalled that a mere sandbar was not worth fighting over.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It was not invaded. What [Carpio] said was not true. They [the Chinese] are just there but they are not claiming anything,” he said in a mixture of Filipino and English. Noting that the Chinese were merely patrolling the area, he added: “Why should I defend a sandbar and kill the Filipinos because of a sandbar?”

Article continues after this advertisement

Assuming, for the sake of argument, that Carpio is mistaken and that Sandy Cay has not been occupied by the Chinese, would that be the end of the issue?

Article continues after this advertisement

It is clear — from the information presented by Alejano, analysis of the photographs conducted by the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, and statements of both Esperon and the President — that an unusual combination of Chinese vessels did loiter in the waters off Pag-asa Island.

Two fishing boats, one Chinese coast guard ship, and two PLAN vessels were or are in the area. Doing what, exactly? The fishing boats seem to be engaged in fishing; the coast guard ship may be providing a protective umbrella for the fishermen. What are the naval vessels for?

Article continues after this advertisement

Even if Sandy Cay has not been occupied, the use of naval vessels represents a ratcheting up of Chinese presence in the area. At a time when all parties to the different maritime disputes in the South China Sea have agreed to re-establish some stability, the entry of the PLAN can only be understood as a deliberate message from Beijing.

The AMTI, an initiative of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington, DC-based think tank, offers a possible reading of that message: “One possible explanation for the flotilla’s sudden and provocative appearance is that Beijing wanted to dissuade Manila from planned construction on [Pag-asa]. The Philippine government has said it plans to spend about $32 million on upgrades including a beaching ramp, desalination facilities, and long-overdue repairs to the islet’s crumbling runway. Those upgrades have been delayed, reportedly due to inclement weather, but [Defense Secretary Delfin] Lorenzana has made clear that they remain in the pipeline.”

It is imperative, then, that the President reassure the nation that the necessary upgrades to the facilities on Pag-asa Island will continue.

On Monday, he had wondered aloud about why China would even be interested in occupying a sandbar: “Why would they risk invading a sandbar and get into a quarrel with us? Ano ang makuha nila? [What will they get out of it?]”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The answer in fact is plain to see. China will not risk it if they can get what they want — in this case, stopping the upgrades on Pag-asa — without having to occupy Sandy Cay. But it will increase the pressure on the Philippines and occupy even a mere sandbar if it thinks that is the key. The Philippines must not only proceed with its plan for Pag-asa; it must do so with unmistakable resolve.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Gary Alejano, Inquirer editorial, Maritime Dispute, Pag-asa Island, South China Sea, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.